64 65 66 4:21 Sun May 15
Man u at it again
|
|
Here we go man u delaying kick off tactics
|
|
|
Replies - Newest Posts First ( Show In Chronological Order)
Alex G
7:36 Mon May 16
Re: Man u at it again
|
If it's a training device for sniffer dogs then why did it have to look like a bomb? Surely it only had to smell like one?
|
ornchurch ammer
1:28 Mon May 16
Re: Man u at it again
|
All sounds a bit dodgy to me.
Five devices put out doesn't need a genius to ensure that they are all returned. Fuck me they could use 1 hand to count them in.
I think that it was left deliberately but whether it was to test the stewards pre check or embarrass Man United I don't know.
|
Tanner
1:21 Mon May 16
Re: Man u at it again
|
Nothing more than a slap on the wrist and a fine.
Given they have already said every fan will get a refund and free entry for the rematch and no doubt paying for Bournemouth hotel extension etc then probably the fine will also be minimal.
31 Penalty for Non-Fulfilment of Fixture Obligations
31.1 Any Club failing to fulfil its fixture obligations in respect of any match under the jurisdiction of The League on the appointed date or dates or causing The League to suspend any fixture shall be deemed guilty of misconduct, unless the circumstances giving rise to such failure are outside the control of the Club and could not have been reasonably foreseen or reasonably anticipated and remedied prior to the match. Every Club shall carry out regular and appropriate maintenance and checks to ensure that its safety certificate is not suspended or withdrawn.
31.2 The Club failing to fulfil its fixture or causing The League to suspend such fixture shall be liable to pay compensation for any expenses actually incurred by the opposing Club as a direct result of the failure or suspension. The amount of compensation will be at the discretion of the Board who will consider every such case on its merits. The Board may refer the amount of compensation to be paid to the Disciplinary Commission dealing with the misconduct by the Club failing to fulfil its fixture or causing The League to suspend the same.
|
Northern Sold
1:05 Mon May 16
Re: Man u at it again
|
Suspect package found....
Ok send in the dogs to check...
The dogs are indicating it's a bomb...
Ok blow the thing up...
Oh.... it's a training device
Carry On Man U
|
stomper
1:01 Mon May 16
Re: Man u at it again
|
Did nobody COUNT the bloody things at the end of the exercise?
|
Northern Sold
12:56 Mon May 16
Re: Man u at it again
|
Training device for sniffer dogs... ha ha ha ha!!!!
THAT IS FUCKING BRILLIANT !!
|
Crassus
12:37 Mon May 16
Re: Man u at it again
|
I wonder what the font of all knowledge, Mr Winter has to say about this?
Fuck all?
Thought so.
|
:^)
12:16 Mon May 16
Re: Man u at it again
|
So they have turned up late to London twice delaying kick-offs and then have their last match abandoned due to their own security cock up?
Sounds a bit fishy to me. Should have a points deduction for failing to meet match day requirements - snidey cunts, that lot.
|
threesixty
12:12 Mon May 16
Re: Man u at it again
|
You would have thought that someone at man utd would have thought.. "thats strange, we had the secuirty training guys in just the other day putting fake bombs around the place, isnt that a co-incidence?" before letting bomb disposal experts blow the thing up!
That has got to be the biggest fuck up of this type I've ever heard of. How can no one at the ground have remembered?
|
Alex G
12:03 Mon May 16
Re: Man u at it again
|
Are all the fans who travelled up going to get their costs refunded? That's a lot of car journeys from Surrey.
Seriously, this is the kind of amateurish cock up that you'd expect us to produce. Utterly negligent behaviour, hope there's a massive fine and points deductions.
|
happygilmore
11:52 Sun May 15
Re: Man u at it again
|
yep make the cunts forfeit the game. Not fair on Bournemouth having to go back on Tuesday.
|
REALGSA
11:51 Sun May 15
Re: Man u at it again
|
Man Utd should be docked 3 points
The stadium wasn't check properly its the securities fault.
They can stop using that firm as well.
|
stoneman
11:47 Sun May 15
Re: Man u at it again
|
Man Utd looking to blame someone else again.
|
BigLump
11:43 Sun May 15
Re: Man u at it again
|
At the same time as asking them about the device, they might be keen to ask about their timekeeping last week.
Not that its connected....
|
Sven Roeder
11:41 Sun May 15
Re: Man u at it again
|
It was a TRAINING DEVICE left behind in error by a security company.
Manchester United obviously should be asked to explain this blunder
Game likely to be played Tuesday night
|
Johnson
11:41 Sun May 15
Re: Man u at it again
|
That's them sacked then.
|
Rivs
11:40 Sun May 15
Re: Man u at it again
|
Per sky it's a training device, accident
Cheating cunts
|
Briano
11:40 Sun May 15
Re: Man u at it again
|
Just been on the news it was a training device mistakenly left in place by a security company.
|
BulphanIron
11:40 Sun May 15
Re: Man u at it again
|
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/sportsnews/article-3591836/Manchester-United-bomb-scare-caused-security-blunder-dummy-device-left-Old-Trafford-toilet-MISTAKE.html
Left there after a training exercise, couldn't make it up...
|
Rivs
11:37 Sun May 15
Re: Man u at it again
|
Odd one this, why you'll someone bring in something like this unless they are looking to go through with something, hopefully even if a hoax they get a long sentence.
|
Lertie Button
11:16 Sun May 15
Re: Man u at it again
|
If it had been Is they would smuggled it in up their arse then detonated it
|
| 
